<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 750 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99187</link>
    <description>Repair and reconditioning of defective electric fans, involving dismantling, replacement of parts, rewinding and refitting, did not amount to manufacture because no new article came into existence; the duty demand on the repaired fans was therefore set aside. Fans found in excess of the recorded R.G. 1 balance were liable to confiscation because the explanation of prior removal from the finishing room was unsupported by the records, so confiscation was upheld. Personal penalties on the Managing Director and General Manager were unsustainable in the absence of a specific attributed act of evasion, while the company&#039;s penalty was reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:02:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 750 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99187</link>
      <description>Repair and reconditioning of defective electric fans, involving dismantling, replacement of parts, rewinding and refitting, did not amount to manufacture because no new article came into existence; the duty demand on the repaired fans was therefore set aside. Fans found in excess of the recorded R.G. 1 balance were liable to confiscation because the explanation of prior removal from the finishing room was unsupported by the records, so confiscation was upheld. Personal penalties on the Managing Director and General Manager were unsustainable in the absence of a specific attributed act of evasion, while the company&#039;s penalty was reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>