<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 866 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99178</link>
    <description>Clubbing of clearances for small-scale exemption requires proof that separate units are mere dummy concerns with common control, financial flow-back, and other indicia of a single enterprise; on the facts, separate registration, different locations, and no adequate evidence of flow-back meant clubbing was not sustainable. Valuation on an undervaluation theory likewise required proof of a related-person relationship or another recognised basis for departing from normal price; mere coordination in turnkey project execution did not establish the statutory relationship. The impugned order, including penalties, was set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:45:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 866 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99178</link>
      <description>Clubbing of clearances for small-scale exemption requires proof that separate units are mere dummy concerns with common control, financial flow-back, and other indicia of a single enterprise; on the facts, separate registration, different locations, and no adequate evidence of flow-back meant clubbing was not sustainable. Valuation on an undervaluation theory likewise required proof of a related-person relationship or another recognised basis for departing from normal price; mere coordination in turnkey project execution did not establish the statutory relationship. The impugned order, including penalties, was set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>