<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 863 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99173</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the demand of duty raised in 1995 for the period from June 1991 to August 1994 was barred by limitation. The Tribunal found that the proper officer should have verified the classification claims before approving the Lists. As this verification was not done, the demand was deemed time-barred. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned Order, allowing the appeals with consequential reliefs to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:39:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 863 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99173</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the demand of duty raised in 1995 for the period from June 1991 to August 1994 was barred by limitation. The Tribunal found that the proper officer should have verified the classification claims before approving the Lists. As this verification was not done, the demand was deemed time-barred. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned Order, allowing the appeals with consequential reliefs to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>