https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99170 A foreign company carrying on business and maintaining a place of business in Bombay was held subject to the High Court's municipal jurisdiction, and the foreign company provisions of the Companies Act did not by themselves oust that jurisdiction. The court also held that it could examine the validity of a resolution amending the company's objects clause, since the existence of a foreign-law remedy did not exclude Indian jurisdiction where local jurisdictional facts existed and the relevant meeting and resolution were in Bombay. On valuation, the suit was found to exceed the City Civil Court limit because the aggregate reliefs were properly valued, giving the High Court pecuniary jurisdiction. en-us Wed, 11 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:31:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99170 A foreign company carrying on business and maintaining a place of business in Bombay was held subject to the High Court's municipal jurisdiction, and the foreign company provisions of the Companies Act did not by themselves oust that jurisdiction. The court also held that it could examine the validity of a resolution amending the company's objects clause, since the existence of a foreign-law remedy did not exclude Indian jurisdiction where local jurisdictional facts existed and the relevant meeting and resolution were in Bombay. On valuation, the suit was found to exceed the City Civil Court limit because the aggregate reliefs were properly valued, giving the High Court pecuniary jurisdiction. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 11 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99170