<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (3) TMI 61 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99168</link>
    <description>In winding-up proceedings, a creditor or debtor may set off mutual monetary claims against the company where the demands arise from reciprocal dealings, including separate chit fund accounts or fixed deposits. Section 529 of the Companies Act, 1956 imports the insolvency rule on mutual dealings and set-off, so pre-existing ordinary-law rights of adjustment are preserved. Section 530 does not bar such set-off because only the net balance remains payable after adjustment. The operative principle is that cross-demands between the company and the creditor may be mutually extinguished to the extent of the overlap, leaving only the balance provable or payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:42:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (3) TMI 61 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99168</link>
      <description>In winding-up proceedings, a creditor or debtor may set off mutual monetary claims against the company where the demands arise from reciprocal dealings, including separate chit fund accounts or fixed deposits. Section 529 of the Companies Act, 1956 imports the insolvency rule on mutual dealings and set-off, so pre-existing ordinary-law rights of adjustment are preserved. Section 530 does not bar such set-off because only the net balance remains payable after adjustment. The operative principle is that cross-demands between the company and the creditor may be mutually extinguished to the extent of the overlap, leaving only the balance provable or payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>