<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (9) TMI 54 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99166</link>
    <description>A clear admission that bidi leaf sales were completed within Orissa bound the parties on situs, so the transactions fell within the statutory definition of sale and were taxable there. The appellate and revisional fee provisions were upheld because the rule-making power extended to incidental matters such as fees, and the prescribed charges operated as service fees rather than a tax. The combined notice and assessment under section 12(5) were also sustained because the assessee was not misled, notice covering multiple quarters was permissible, and an opportunity to produce accounts was given. The appeal succeeded, the High Court decision was set aside, and the assessment and penalty proceedings remained intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (9) TMI 54 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99166</link>
      <description>A clear admission that bidi leaf sales were completed within Orissa bound the parties on situs, so the transactions fell within the statutory definition of sale and were taxable there. The appellate and revisional fee provisions were upheld because the rule-making power extended to incidental matters such as fees, and the prescribed charges operated as service fees rather than a tax. The combined notice and assessment under section 12(5) were also sustained because the assessee was not misled, notice covering multiple quarters was permissible, and an opportunity to produce accounts was given. The appeal succeeded, the High Court decision was set aside, and the assessment and penalty proceedings remained intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>