<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (11) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99162</link>
    <description>Where the Companies Act requires subsequent winding-up proceedings to continue in the District Court, a valid assignment by the District Judge to an Additional District Judge under the Punjab Courts Act, 1918, as amended, allows the transferee court to act as the District Judge for that case. The deeming fiction gives the Additional District Judge co-equal authority over the assigned winding-up matter, so jurisdictional objection fails. Once the liquidation proceedings are validly assigned, all subsequent applications arising from that case, including an application under section 446(2), may be filed directly before the Additional District Judge without routing them again through the District Judge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:33:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (11) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99162</link>
      <description>Where the Companies Act requires subsequent winding-up proceedings to continue in the District Court, a valid assignment by the District Judge to an Additional District Judge under the Punjab Courts Act, 1918, as amended, allows the transferee court to act as the District Judge for that case. The deeming fiction gives the Additional District Judge co-equal authority over the assigned winding-up matter, so jurisdictional objection fails. Once the liquidation proceedings are validly assigned, all subsequent applications arising from that case, including an application under section 446(2), may be filed directly before the Additional District Judge without routing them again through the District Judge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>