https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99156 In misfeasance proceedings under section 235 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, the liquidator must specifically plead and prove the directors' wrongful acts, breach of trust, or misappropriation, and liability cannot be imposed on unsupported allegations. The discussion also states that additional evidence in appeal may be allowed under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure where the trial court wrongly refused admissible defence evidence or where such evidence is needed to enable judgment. On the facts noted, several claimed items lacked reliable proof, while only the amounts sufficiently established on the record were sustained, and the appellate interference was confined accordingly. en-us Mon, 26 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Aug 2014 11:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99156 In misfeasance proceedings under section 235 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, the liquidator must specifically plead and prove the directors' wrongful acts, breach of trust, or misappropriation, and liability cannot be imposed on unsupported allegations. The discussion also states that additional evidence in appeal may be allowed under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure where the trial court wrongly refused admissible defence evidence or where such evidence is needed to enable judgment. On the facts noted, several claimed items lacked reliable proof, while only the amounts sufficiently established on the record were sustained, and the appellate interference was confined accordingly. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 26 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99156