<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 839 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99149</link>
    <description>Duty on scrap allegedly arising from capital goods on which Modvat credit had been taken under Rule 57Q could not be confirmed without first verifying the scrap&#039;s actual nature and origin. The record did not support an assumption that capital goods acquired in March 1994 would have been reduced to scrap within a short period, and the adjudicating authority had not properly examined whether the demand was sustainable on the factual basis of the waste and scrap found in the factory. The matter therefore required fresh factual scrutiny, and the order was set aside with remand to the Commissioner for verification of the type and nature of the waste and scrap.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:07:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 839 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99149</link>
      <description>Duty on scrap allegedly arising from capital goods on which Modvat credit had been taken under Rule 57Q could not be confirmed without first verifying the scrap&#039;s actual nature and origin. The record did not support an assumption that capital goods acquired in March 1994 would have been reduced to scrap within a short period, and the adjudicating authority had not properly examined whether the demand was sustainable on the factual basis of the waste and scrap found in the factory. The matter therefore required fresh factual scrutiny, and the order was set aside with remand to the Commissioner for verification of the type and nature of the waste and scrap.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>