https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99143 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai held in 2000 (8) TMI 833 that the Commissioner should be the appellant, not the Deputy Commissioner. Failure to rectify errors may result in dismissal. Case set for 29-9-2000. en-us Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:57:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99143 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai held in 2000 (8) TMI 833 that the Commissioner should be the appellant, not the Deputy Commissioner. Failure to rectify errors may result in dismissal. Case set for 29-9-2000. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99143