<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 830 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99140</link>
    <description>A refund claim under Rule 173L could not be refused merely because the assessments were provisional. Once the assessments were finalised, the claim was no longer premature and had to be examined on its merits. The earlier refusal, based solely on the provisional nature of the assessments, was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:50:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 830 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99140</link>
      <description>A refund claim under Rule 173L could not be refused merely because the assessments were provisional. Once the assessments were finalised, the claim was no longer premature and had to be examined on its merits. The earlier refusal, based solely on the provisional nature of the assessments, was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>