<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 826 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99136</link>
    <description>Personal penalty for alleged unauthorised importation of raw silk was held unsustainable where the case rested mainly on a co-accused clearing agent&#039;s statement and the appellant&#039;s Section 108 Customs Act statement denied involvement. The earlier exoneration on the same allegations had already found the evidentiary basis insufficient, and no just or tangible material was available on the record to prove participation. The penalty was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:47:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 826 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99136</link>
      <description>Personal penalty for alleged unauthorised importation of raw silk was held unsustainable where the case rested mainly on a co-accused clearing agent&#039;s statement and the appellant&#039;s Section 108 Customs Act statement denied involvement. The earlier exoneration on the same allegations had already found the evidentiary basis insufficient, and no just or tangible material was available on the record to prove participation. The penalty was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>