<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 819 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99129</link>
    <description>An exemption notification for goods cleared for home consumption was construed so that the deeming treatment of exports to Nepal or Bhutan operated only for limit computation and valuation, not as a full conversion of such exports into home-consumption clearances. On that basis, payment of duty on exports to Nepal did not amount to an election to forgo the benefit of Notification No. 1/93-C.E. for later domestic clearances. The assessee therefore retained the exemption for subsequent clearances for home consumption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:39:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 819 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99129</link>
      <description>An exemption notification for goods cleared for home consumption was construed so that the deeming treatment of exports to Nepal or Bhutan operated only for limit computation and valuation, not as a full conversion of such exports into home-consumption clearances. On that basis, payment of duty on exports to Nepal did not amount to an election to forgo the benefit of Notification No. 1/93-C.E. for later domestic clearances. The assessee therefore retained the exemption for subsequent clearances for home consumption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>