<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 817 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99127</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that Service Charges paid by the appellants should be included in the assessable value of goods. The conversion rate for determining the assessable value must align with statutory guidelines. Stamp duty cannot be included in the assessable value as it is not part of the goods&#039; price. The extended limitation period was upheld due to the appellants&#039; wilful suppression of facts. Penalties imposed on the appellants were reduced by 50% in each appeal based on the circumstances and merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:36:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 817 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99127</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that Service Charges paid by the appellants should be included in the assessable value of goods. The conversion rate for determining the assessable value must align with statutory guidelines. Stamp duty cannot be included in the assessable value as it is not part of the goods&#039; price. The extended limitation period was upheld due to the appellants&#039; wilful suppression of facts. Penalties imposed on the appellants were reduced by 50% in each appeal based on the circumstances and merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>