<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 816 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99126</link>
    <description>The commentary addresses two customs-law factual questions referred to the High Court under Section 130(b) of the Customs Act. First, it considers whether the marking &quot;Sussie&quot; on seized gold bars denotes the brand &quot;Credit Sussie&quot; and therefore supports a claim of lawful import; the matter was treated as a factual issue for High Court determination rather than a finding by the Tribunal. Second, it examines whether confiscation of seized silver ingots can be sustained on the basis of minor weight discrepancies; this too was regarded as a factual question requiring referral. The registry was directed to transmit the paper book for the High Court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:35:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 816 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99126</link>
      <description>The commentary addresses two customs-law factual questions referred to the High Court under Section 130(b) of the Customs Act. First, it considers whether the marking &quot;Sussie&quot; on seized gold bars denotes the brand &quot;Credit Sussie&quot; and therefore supports a claim of lawful import; the matter was treated as a factual issue for High Court determination rather than a finding by the Tribunal. Second, it examines whether confiscation of seized silver ingots can be sustained on the basis of minor weight discrepancies; this too was regarded as a factual question requiring referral. The registry was directed to transmit the paper book for the High Court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>