https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99111 The High Court of Delhi held that it had territorial jurisdiction to try the suit, no leave of the court was required for the liquidator to institute the suit, and the form of the suit needed to be amended to be in the name and on behalf of the company. The plaintiff was allowed to amend the plaint accordingly. en-us Tue, 28 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:09:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99111 The High Court of Delhi held that it had territorial jurisdiction to try the suit, no leave of the court was required for the liquidator to institute the suit, and the form of the suit needed to be amended to be in the name and on behalf of the company. The plaintiff was allowed to amend the plaint accordingly. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 28 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99111