https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99106 Section 80 CPC notice was held unnecessary before suing a company in liquidation through the official liquidator, because the proceeding was treated as one against the company under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 and not against any act done by the liquidator in his official capacity. The request for appointment of a receiver over charged and hypothecated assets was refused since the properties were already with the official liquidator, no immediate risk to the assets was shown, and the plaintiff had not established a prima facie title or valid equitable mortgage. The assets were to be preserved and inventoried, with disposal only after notice to concerned parties. en-us Mon, 27 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:53:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99106 Section 80 CPC notice was held unnecessary before suing a company in liquidation through the official liquidator, because the proceeding was treated as one against the company under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 and not against any act done by the liquidator in his official capacity. The request for appointment of a receiver over charged and hypothecated assets was refused since the properties were already with the official liquidator, no immediate risk to the assets was shown, and the plaintiff had not established a prima facie title or valid equitable mortgage. The assets were to be preserved and inventoried, with disposal only after notice to concerned parties. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 27 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99106