<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (5) TMI 65 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99103</link>
    <description>Rule 139 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, is treated as directory when used to regulate applications for court sanction under section 457(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, because the statute makes the court&#039;s sanction the essential requirement and does not make strict procedural compliance a jurisdictional condition. Non-issuance of notice to the petitioning creditor did not invalidate the sanction where the respondents were only debtors and were not persons prejudicially affected by the order. The sanction granted by the court therefore remained valid, and non-compliance with the rule could not defeat the petition&#039;s maintainability on that ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:45:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (5) TMI 65 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99103</link>
      <description>Rule 139 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, is treated as directory when used to regulate applications for court sanction under section 457(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, because the statute makes the court&#039;s sanction the essential requirement and does not make strict procedural compliance a jurisdictional condition. Non-issuance of notice to the petitioning creditor did not invalidate the sanction where the respondents were only debtors and were not persons prejudicially affected by the order. The sanction granted by the court therefore remained valid, and non-compliance with the rule could not defeat the petition&#039;s maintainability on that ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>