<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 732 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99102</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation order and penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Customs on uncut precious stones and VCRs, citing lack of concrete evidence proving foreign origin and smuggling. Expert analysis confirmed the stones were domestically sourced, contradicting Revenue&#039;s claim of Burmese origin. Emphasizing the burden of proof on Revenue and the necessity of expert opinion, the Tribunal granted the appeal, highlighting the importance of establishing foreign origin before deeming goods as smuggled. The absence of substantial evidence supporting smuggling allegations led to the decision to overturn the confiscation order and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:44:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 732 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99102</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation order and penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Customs on uncut precious stones and VCRs, citing lack of concrete evidence proving foreign origin and smuggling. Expert analysis confirmed the stones were domestically sourced, contradicting Revenue&#039;s claim of Burmese origin. Emphasizing the burden of proof on Revenue and the necessity of expert opinion, the Tribunal granted the appeal, highlighting the importance of establishing foreign origin before deeming goods as smuggled. The absence of substantial evidence supporting smuggling allegations led to the decision to overturn the confiscation order and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>