<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 719 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99089</link>
    <description>Invoices issued by an unregistered dealer before December 1994 were not valid duty paying documents for Modvat credit because Notification No. 32/94 required dealers and traders to obtain registration, and the departmental instructions treated invoices as regularisable only if registration was secured on or before 31-12-1994. As the dealer remained unregistered by that date, the mandatory condition for validity of the invoices was not met, and Modvat credit was rightly denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 719 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99089</link>
      <description>Invoices issued by an unregistered dealer before December 1994 were not valid duty paying documents for Modvat credit because Notification No. 32/94 required dealers and traders to obtain registration, and the departmental instructions treated invoices as regularisable only if registration was secured on or before 31-12-1994. As the dealer remained unregistered by that date, the mandatory condition for validity of the invoices was not met, and Modvat credit was rightly denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>