<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (3) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99080</link>
    <description>The court found that the official liquidator failed to follow prescribed procedures in handling the creditor&#039;s claim, including using incorrect forms for acceptance or rejection. Despite the appeal being filed late, the court intervened under section 460(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, due to the official liquidator&#039;s errors. The court directed the official liquidator to rectify the decision-making process and address the appellant&#039;s claim appropriately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:08:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (3) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99080</link>
      <description>The court found that the official liquidator failed to follow prescribed procedures in handling the creditor&#039;s claim, including using incorrect forms for acceptance or rejection. Despite the appeal being filed late, the court intervened under section 460(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, due to the official liquidator&#039;s errors. The court directed the official liquidator to rectify the decision-making process and address the appellant&#039;s claim appropriately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>