<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 703 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99074</link>
    <description>Rule 3(1) of the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 requires the Commissioner to determine furnace capacity on the basis of the manufacturer&#039;s invoice or trader&#039;s invoice where such document is available. The alternative of relying on other material applies only if no invoice is available. On that reasoning, the Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate, the National Institute of Secondary Steel Technology certificate, and the manufacturer&#039;s revised opinion did not have to be considered. Refusal to take those materials into account did not amount to breach of natural justice, and remand was not justified. The Commissioner&#039;s capacity determination was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:03:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 703 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99074</link>
      <description>Rule 3(1) of the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 requires the Commissioner to determine furnace capacity on the basis of the manufacturer&#039;s invoice or trader&#039;s invoice where such document is available. The alternative of relying on other material applies only if no invoice is available. On that reasoning, the Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate, the National Institute of Secondary Steel Technology certificate, and the manufacturer&#039;s revised opinion did not have to be considered. Refusal to take those materials into account did not amount to breach of natural justice, and remand was not justified. The Commissioner&#039;s capacity determination was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>