<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (12) TMI 56 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99069</link>
    <description>The residuary power under the amalgamation provisions is confined to directions necessary to complete and make effective the reconstruction or amalgamation, applying ejusdem generis to clauses incidental or consequential to the scheme. A request to compel the transferee company to discharge the transferor company&#039;s antecedent tax liability was held outside that scope, because it would amount to independent enforcement rather than a step required to effect the amalgamation. Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was also held inapplicable to such special-statute proceedings, but that did not assist the applicant because the petition failed on maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:47:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (12) TMI 56 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99069</link>
      <description>The residuary power under the amalgamation provisions is confined to directions necessary to complete and make effective the reconstruction or amalgamation, applying ejusdem generis to clauses incidental or consequential to the scheme. A request to compel the transferee company to discharge the transferor company&#039;s antecedent tax liability was held outside that scope, because it would amount to independent enforcement rather than a step required to effect the amalgamation. Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was also held inapplicable to such special-statute proceedings, but that did not assist the applicant because the petition failed on maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>