https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99064 The judgment clarified the procedure for substitution of petitioners in a winding-up petition under the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. It emphasized the importance of protecting the interests of all parties involved and ensuring that supporting applications are not kept pending unnecessarily. The court directed the petitioner to file a list of supporting applicants to allow them to be heard in the main petition. This approach aimed to streamline the process and enable applicants to seek substitution as petitioners when necessary, in accordance with the rules. en-us Thu, 22 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:44:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99064 The judgment clarified the procedure for substitution of petitioners in a winding-up petition under the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. It emphasized the importance of protecting the interests of all parties involved and ensuring that supporting applications are not kept pending unnecessarily. The court directed the petitioner to file a list of supporting applicants to allow them to be heard in the main petition. This approach aimed to streamline the process and enable applicants to seek substitution as petitioners when necessary, in accordance with the rules. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 22 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99064