<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (9) TMI 57 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99046</link>
    <description>The SC concluded that Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act permits recovery of payments made under a mistake of law. The respondent, having paid sales tax later deemed ultra vires, was entitled to a refund despite the voluntary nature of the payments. The principle of estoppel was inapplicable as both parties shared the legal mistake. The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the respondent&#039;s right to recover the amounts paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (9) TMI 57 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99046</link>
      <description>The SC concluded that Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act permits recovery of payments made under a mistake of law. The respondent, having paid sales tax later deemed ultra vires, was entitled to a refund despite the voluntary nature of the payments. The principle of estoppel was inapplicable as both parties shared the legal mistake. The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the respondent&#039;s right to recover the amounts paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>