https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99039 Section 17 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 required each special resolution to be placed in a separate petition, so a consolidated petition seeking confirmation of two resolutions was procedurally incompetent. Once the petition was confined to the single resolution of 27 October 1972 changing the registered office from Punjab to Delhi, there was no opposition from the Registrar of Companies or the creditor and the shareholders had unanimously approved the change, so the resolution was confirmed and the memorandum of association was directed to be amended accordingly. en-us Thu, 10 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:52:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99039 Section 17 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 required each special resolution to be placed in a separate petition, so a consolidated petition seeking confirmation of two resolutions was procedurally incompetent. Once the petition was confined to the single resolution of 27 October 1972 changing the registered office from Punjab to Delhi, there was no opposition from the Registrar of Companies or the creditor and the shareholders had unanimously approved the change, so the resolution was confirmed and the memorandum of association was directed to be amended accordingly. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 10 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99039