<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 616 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99037</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 182/87-C.E. was available where the workshop satisfied the notification conditions, and the term &quot;precincts&quot; could not be read narrowly to defeat relief when the workshop served mines under the same management. An earlier Tribunal order in the same parties&#039; case had already accepted that position, had not been shown to be challenged, and had therefore attained finality. On identical facts, the adjudicating authority was required to follow that final decision. A subsequent departmental order granting similar relief under a pari materia notification also supported the consistent application of the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:46:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 616 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99037</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 182/87-C.E. was available where the workshop satisfied the notification conditions, and the term &quot;precincts&quot; could not be read narrowly to defeat relief when the workshop served mines under the same management. An earlier Tribunal order in the same parties&#039; case had already accepted that position, had not been shown to be challenged, and had therefore attained finality. On identical facts, the adjudicating authority was required to follow that final decision. A subsequent departmental order granting similar relief under a pari materia notification also supported the consistent application of the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>