<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (8) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99026</link>
    <description>Revision under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure remains available where the missed appeal lies under a special statute and not under the Code; section 439(5) does not bar such revisional jurisdiction merely because no appeal was filed under section 11(2) of the Probation of Offenders Act. The document also notes that release on admonition under section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act is inappropriate where a company&#039;s failure to file its balance-sheet is deliberate, persistent, and contrary to mandatory disclosure obligations meant to protect shareholders, creditors, and the public. In that setting, the text indicates that a monetary penalty may be substituted for probationary relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:34:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (8) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99026</link>
      <description>Revision under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure remains available where the missed appeal lies under a special statute and not under the Code; section 439(5) does not bar such revisional jurisdiction merely because no appeal was filed under section 11(2) of the Probation of Offenders Act. The document also notes that release on admonition under section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act is inappropriate where a company&#039;s failure to file its balance-sheet is deliberate, persistent, and contrary to mandatory disclosure obligations meant to protect shareholders, creditors, and the public. In that setting, the text indicates that a monetary penalty may be substituted for probationary relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>