<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 602 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99022</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the original order and directed a remand for fresh examination, emphasizing the need to consider technical evidence and citations presented by the appellants for the classification of imported Vitamin Pre-mix Feed. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of a defined term &quot;concentrates&quot; in the policy, necessitating reference to technical literature for a comprehensive evaluation before issuing a new decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:31:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 602 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99022</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the original order and directed a remand for fresh examination, emphasizing the need to consider technical evidence and citations presented by the appellants for the classification of imported Vitamin Pre-mix Feed. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of a defined term &quot;concentrates&quot; in the policy, necessitating reference to technical literature for a comprehensive evaluation before issuing a new decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>