<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 595 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99015</link>
    <description>Enhancement of the assessable value of imported copper scrap was not interfered with because the Revenue produced no further specific material to justify a higher value, and the objection that the order was not speaking did not supply a legal basis for further increase. Enhancement of redemption fine was also refused because no evidence showed a higher margin of profit or other material warranting revision, with margin of profit being only a guiding factor. Enhancement of penalty was rejected since no concrete ground was shown for increasing the amount already imposed. The Commissioner&#039;s order was left undisturbed and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:15:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 595 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99015</link>
      <description>Enhancement of the assessable value of imported copper scrap was not interfered with because the Revenue produced no further specific material to justify a higher value, and the objection that the order was not speaking did not supply a legal basis for further increase. Enhancement of redemption fine was also refused because no evidence showed a higher margin of profit or other material warranting revision, with margin of profit being only a guiding factor. Enhancement of penalty was rejected since no concrete ground was shown for increasing the amount already imposed. The Commissioner&#039;s order was left undisturbed and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>