<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (8) TMI 61 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99008</link>
    <description>A company may be wound up where it has remained inactive for a long period after incorporation, gives no satisfactory explanation for the delay, and shows no realistic prospect of carrying on business profitably. The text treats prolonged non-commencement of business, speculative assertions of future activity without supporting material, absence of reserve and surplus, and recurring early losses as indicators that the company&#039;s substratum has failed. On those facts, the just and equitable ground and the ground of inability to commence business were regarded as properly attracted, and the winding-up petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:04:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (8) TMI 61 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99008</link>
      <description>A company may be wound up where it has remained inactive for a long period after incorporation, gives no satisfactory explanation for the delay, and shows no realistic prospect of carrying on business profitably. The text treats prolonged non-commencement of business, speculative assertions of future activity without supporting material, absence of reserve and surplus, and recurring early losses as indicators that the company&#039;s substratum has failed. On those facts, the just and equitable ground and the ground of inability to commence business were regarded as properly attracted, and the winding-up petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>