<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 581 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99002</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit of penalties under Rule 209A was sought on the ground that the applicants were only clerks, had already left employment, and could not pay because of financial hardship. The Tribunal also relied on its earlier order in a connected matter involving the same issue and similar relief. On that basis, it waived deposit of the penalties imposed on each applicant and stayed recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:53:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 581 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99002</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit of penalties under Rule 209A was sought on the ground that the applicants were only clerks, had already left employment, and could not pay because of financial hardship. The Tribunal also relied on its earlier order in a connected matter involving the same issue and similar relief. On that basis, it waived deposit of the penalties imposed on each applicant and stayed recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>