<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 860 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98992</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order of confiscation and penalty. The Tribunal found that the appellant had provided reasonable proof of acquiring the goods legally. The burden of proving illicit importation rests on the department, and the penalty pre-deposit was waived with a stay of recovery pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:41:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 860 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98992</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order of confiscation and penalty. The Tribunal found that the appellant had provided reasonable proof of acquiring the goods legally. The burden of proving illicit importation rests on the department, and the penalty pre-deposit was waived with a stay of recovery pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>