<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 855 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98985</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the duty confirmation and penalty imposition. The judgment emphasized honoring contract prices, even in cases of late disclosure, as long as the actual price recovered from customers aligns with the contract terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:37:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 855 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98985</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the duty confirmation and penalty imposition. The judgment emphasized honoring contract prices, even in cases of late disclosure, as long as the actual price recovered from customers aligns with the contract terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>