<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 851 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98981</link>
    <description>Penalty under the Customs Act for unauthorised import of a boat was considered in light of the import policy and a clarification from the licensing authority. Although the import was found unauthorised, the surrounding policy position created genuine doubt about whether sailing boats and similar craft fell within the negative list. The vessel&#039;s nature and intended use supported the importer&#039;s bona fide belief that the item was not prohibited. On that basis, penalty under Section 112 was held not justified and the setting aside of the penalty was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:28:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 851 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98981</link>
      <description>Penalty under the Customs Act for unauthorised import of a boat was considered in light of the import policy and a clarification from the licensing authority. Although the import was found unauthorised, the surrounding policy position created genuine doubt about whether sailing boats and similar craft fell within the negative list. The vessel&#039;s nature and intended use supported the importer&#039;s bona fide belief that the item was not prohibited. On that basis, penalty under Section 112 was held not justified and the setting aside of the penalty was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>