<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (4) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98977</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, confirming the resolution to alter the memorandum and transfer the registered office from Calcutta to New Delhi. It found the extraordinary general meeting and resolution valid, dismissed the employees&#039; union&#039;s locus standi, confirmed compliance with statutory requirements, and rejected allegations of mala fides. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:16:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (4) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98977</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, confirming the resolution to alter the memorandum and transfer the registered office from Calcutta to New Delhi. It found the extraordinary general meeting and resolution valid, dismissed the employees&#039; union&#039;s locus standi, confirmed compliance with statutory requirements, and rejected allegations of mala fides. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>