<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 838 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98967</link>
    <description>Where duty is proposed on alleged clandestine removal arising from stock shortages, the adjudicating authority must first consider applicable Board circular guidelines on loss percentage and the material placed by the assessee before quantifying liability. Failure to do so renders the determination incomplete. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo adjudication after hearing both parties. The question of limitation was left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:02:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 838 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98967</link>
      <description>Where duty is proposed on alleged clandestine removal arising from stock shortages, the adjudicating authority must first consider applicable Board circular guidelines on loss percentage and the material placed by the assessee before quantifying liability. Failure to do so renders the determination incomplete. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo adjudication after hearing both parties. The question of limitation was left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>