https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98965 The court dismissed both the appeal and cross-objection due to the appeal being filed in the former company name, which was no longer registered after the company had legally changed its name and registration. The court emphasized the necessity of accurately reflecting the legal status of parties in court proceedings, particularly concerning company names and registrations, and underscored the importance of complying with procedural requirements and initiating legal actions in the correct entity name as per the Companies Act. en-us Mon, 21 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:02:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98965 The court dismissed both the appeal and cross-objection due to the appeal being filed in the former company name, which was no longer registered after the company had legally changed its name and registration. The court emphasized the necessity of accurately reflecting the legal status of parties in court proceedings, particularly concerning company names and registrations, and underscored the importance of complying with procedural requirements and initiating legal actions in the correct entity name as per the Companies Act. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 21 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98965