<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (8) TMI 150 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98944</link>
    <description>The court rejected the company&#039;s contentions in an application for a stay of a Company Petition seeking winding up. The court found the company&#039;s defense improbable, lacking written evidence for an alleged oral agreement for set-off. Emphasizing the lack of support from the company&#039;s directors and failure to reply to statutory notice, the court held the winding-up application bona fide. The court ordered a permanent stay if the outstanding amount was paid by a specified date; failure would dismiss the stay application with costs, leading to further proceedings. The interim stay was to continue until the payment deadline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:38:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (8) TMI 150 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98944</link>
      <description>The court rejected the company&#039;s contentions in an application for a stay of a Company Petition seeking winding up. The court found the company&#039;s defense improbable, lacking written evidence for an alleged oral agreement for set-off. Emphasizing the lack of support from the company&#039;s directors and failure to reply to statutory notice, the court held the winding-up application bona fide. The court ordered a permanent stay if the outstanding amount was paid by a specified date; failure would dismiss the stay application with costs, leading to further proceedings. The interim stay was to continue until the payment deadline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>