https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98938 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners in a case concerning the verification and signing of a petition under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act 1956. The judge held that the petition was duly signed and verified as required by law, even though it did not strictly adhere to the Code of Civil Procedure. Additionally, the court found that the petitioners' direct filing negated the need for a schedule with member consents as per Form No. 43. Both objections raised by the company were dismissed, and costs were awarded to the petitioners, with the case proceeding for further consideration on a later date. en-us Thu, 12 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:31:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98938 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners in a case concerning the verification and signing of a petition under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act 1956. The judge held that the petition was duly signed and verified as required by law, even though it did not strictly adhere to the Code of Civil Procedure. Additionally, the court found that the petitioners' direct filing negated the need for a schedule with member consents as per Form No. 43. Both objections raised by the company were dismissed, and costs were awarded to the petitioners, with the case proceeding for further consideration on a later date. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 12 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98938