<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (4) TMI 48 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98933</link>
    <description>A single and indivisible works contract does not involve a sale of the materials used in execution, because the constitutional expression &quot;sale of goods&quot; carries the same meaning as under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930; the State could not therefore tax such materials by treating them as a separate sale under Entry 48. The notification withdrawing the exemption for goods sold to the Government was held to be a valid exercise of delegated power, since the exemption scheme was conditional and the executive was authorised to modify the schedule within the legislative policy. The levy on works contracts was restrained, while the exemption notification was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (4) TMI 48 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98933</link>
      <description>A single and indivisible works contract does not involve a sale of the materials used in execution, because the constitutional expression &quot;sale of goods&quot; carries the same meaning as under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930; the State could not therefore tax such materials by treating them as a separate sale under Entry 48. The notification withdrawing the exemption for goods sold to the Government was held to be a valid exercise of delegated power, since the exemption scheme was conditional and the executive was authorised to modify the schedule within the legislative policy. The levy on works contracts was restrained, while the exemption notification was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>