<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (8) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98926</link>
    <description>Commission payable to a managing director was held to be salary where the articles of association and appointment terms showed a contract of service rather than an independent agency. The decisive test was the true nature of the relationship created by the governing documents: the managing director was subject to the board&#039;s control, bound to implement board decisions, and removable for lack of diligence or acting against company interests. The absence of day-to-day supervision was not conclusive. On these features, the receipt fell within salary under section 7 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and not business income under section 10.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (8) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98926</link>
      <description>Commission payable to a managing director was held to be salary where the articles of association and appointment terms showed a contract of service rather than an independent agency. The decisive test was the true nature of the relationship created by the governing documents: the managing director was subject to the board&#039;s control, bound to implement board decisions, and removable for lack of diligence or acting against company interests. The absence of day-to-day supervision was not conclusive. On these features, the receipt fell within salary under section 7 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and not business income under section 10.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>