<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (11) TMI 89 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98897</link>
    <description>A statutory transfer of winding-up proceedings to another court does not turn that court into a Single Judge of the High Court, so intra-court appeal limitation tied to such orders does not apply. A holder of fully paid-up shares remains a contributory under the Companies Act and may invoke section 556, but the application must still rest on effective prior notice to the liquidator and compliance with the 14-day waiting period. Section 461(2) permits inspection only of the liquidator&#039;s prescribed books, not account books, and the right is not enlarged by the rules. Where entitlement to return of gas cylinders turns on disputed facts, the matter should not be decided summarily without evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:54:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (11) TMI 89 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98897</link>
      <description>A statutory transfer of winding-up proceedings to another court does not turn that court into a Single Judge of the High Court, so intra-court appeal limitation tied to such orders does not apply. A holder of fully paid-up shares remains a contributory under the Companies Act and may invoke section 556, but the application must still rest on effective prior notice to the liquidator and compliance with the 14-day waiting period. Section 461(2) permits inspection only of the liquidator&#039;s prescribed books, not account books, and the right is not enlarged by the rules. Where entitlement to return of gas cylinders turns on disputed facts, the matter should not be decided summarily without evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>