<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 667 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98892</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57Q was available only where the item had a direct, essential and proximate nexus with production or processing of the final product. Goods used merely for repair or maintenance, such as extra equipment and a truing machine, were outside the scope of capital goods and credit was disallowed on those items. Machinery used for crushing coal for boiler feed, maintaining humidity for production, removing impurities during processing, and ensuring uninterrupted water supply to the dye house was treated as capital goods because it supported the manufacturing process directly. Credit was therefore allowed on those items, and the penalty was reduced proportionately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:42:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 667 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98892</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57Q was available only where the item had a direct, essential and proximate nexus with production or processing of the final product. Goods used merely for repair or maintenance, such as extra equipment and a truing machine, were outside the scope of capital goods and credit was disallowed on those items. Machinery used for crushing coal for boiler feed, maintaining humidity for production, removing impurities during processing, and ensuring uninterrupted water supply to the dye house was treated as capital goods because it supported the manufacturing process directly. Credit was therefore allowed on those items, and the penalty was reduced proportionately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>