<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 666 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98891</link>
    <description>Free-supplied items from the Railways were treated as includible in the value of the final product, but the appellants were entitled to Modvat credit on the duty paid on those inputs. The demand was therefore required to be reworked after allowing admissible credit and re-quantifying the duty accordingly. Personal penalty was held unwarranted because there was no negligence by either side and the issue was debatable at the relevant time, so the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:39:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 666 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98891</link>
      <description>Free-supplied items from the Railways were treated as includible in the value of the final product, but the appellants were entitled to Modvat credit on the duty paid on those inputs. The demand was therefore required to be reworked after allowing admissible credit and re-quantifying the duty accordingly. Personal penalty was held unwarranted because there was no negligence by either side and the issue was debatable at the relevant time, so the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>