<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 664 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98890</link>
    <description>On reversal of Modvat credit, brake linings could be cleared without attracting the higher duty rate because the deeming fiction under Rule 57-F applied only for determining the rate of duty. The fact that the exemption under Notification No. 59/90-C.E. had already been extended to the original manufacturers did not, by itself, defeat clearance of the goods by the assessee after reversal of credit. As no material was shown to disturb the appellate authority&#039;s view, the demand for higher duty was not sustained and the order in favour of the assessee was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:36:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 664 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98890</link>
      <description>On reversal of Modvat credit, brake linings could be cleared without attracting the higher duty rate because the deeming fiction under Rule 57-F applied only for determining the rate of duty. The fact that the exemption under Notification No. 59/90-C.E. had already been extended to the original manufacturers did not, by itself, defeat clearance of the goods by the assessee after reversal of credit. As no material was shown to disturb the appellate authority&#039;s view, the demand for higher duty was not sustained and the order in favour of the assessee was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>