https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98882 A demand notice for arrears of rent under the Delhi Rent Control Act remains valid even if it does not expressly warn that eviction will follow on default, because the statutory consequence of non-payment flows from the Act itself and the notice serves only to demand payment. A composite notice referring to other remedies, including winding-up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956, does not invalidate the demand if it clearly calls for arrears and possession on termination of tenancy. A challenge to that notice does not defeat an order under section 15(1), since the deposit direction is made when an eviction petition on non-payment is filed and validity is examined later. The demand notice and deposit order were upheld. en-us Wed, 18 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:44:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98882 A demand notice for arrears of rent under the Delhi Rent Control Act remains valid even if it does not expressly warn that eviction will follow on default, because the statutory consequence of non-payment flows from the Act itself and the notice serves only to demand payment. A composite notice referring to other remedies, including winding-up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956, does not invalidate the demand if it clearly calls for arrears and possession on termination of tenancy. A challenge to that notice does not defeat an order under section 15(1), since the deposit direction is made when an eviction petition on non-payment is filed and validity is examined later. The demand notice and deposit order were upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 18 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98882