<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 788 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98871</link>
    <description>Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was not an unconditional exemption up to the specified clearance limit because paragraph 3 imposed a further condition on the aggregate value of clearances of excisable goods consumed directly by the manufacturer or removed from the factory. As the assessee did not show compliance with that condition, the Modvat credit-based duty demand could not be treated as unsustainable on the ground that the exemption was absolute. The operative effect is that the exemption remained conditional, and the demand was not liable to be interfered with on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:14:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 788 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98871</link>
      <description>Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was not an unconditional exemption up to the specified clearance limit because paragraph 3 imposed a further condition on the aggregate value of clearances of excisable goods consumed directly by the manufacturer or removed from the factory. As the assessee did not show compliance with that condition, the Modvat credit-based duty demand could not be treated as unsustainable on the ground that the exemption was absolute. The operative effect is that the exemption remained conditional, and the demand was not liable to be interfered with on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>