<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 657 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98842</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai condoned the delay in filing the appeal by Ratankumar Agrawal due to a previous joint appeal. The appeals were made against the confiscation of fabrics and imposition of penalty on both parties for not paying duty on processed fabrics. Despite the departmental representative&#039;s argument, the tribunal applied the Delhi High Court judgment in Pioneer Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, setting aside the confiscation and penalty. The tribunal resolved the conflict between the Gujarat High Court and Delhi High Court judgments, ultimately allowing the appeals and overturning the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:25:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 657 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98842</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai condoned the delay in filing the appeal by Ratankumar Agrawal due to a previous joint appeal. The appeals were made against the confiscation of fabrics and imposition of penalty on both parties for not paying duty on processed fabrics. Despite the departmental representative&#039;s argument, the tribunal applied the Delhi High Court judgment in Pioneer Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, setting aside the confiscation and penalty. The tribunal resolved the conflict between the Gujarat High Court and Delhi High Court judgments, ultimately allowing the appeals and overturning the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>