<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 643 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98835</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal on duty demands for clearance of grey fabrics, specific quantity fabrics with unclear lot numbers, and unaccounted damaged fabrics due to lack of evidence and substantiation by the appellant. However, the order of confiscation of goods and penalty was set aside based on a Delhi High Court judgment. The tribunal partially allowed the appeal by upholding duty demands but overturning the confiscation and penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:10:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 643 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98835</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal on duty demands for clearance of grey fabrics, specific quantity fabrics with unclear lot numbers, and unaccounted damaged fabrics due to lack of evidence and substantiation by the appellant. However, the order of confiscation of goods and penalty was set aside based on a Delhi High Court judgment. The tribunal partially allowed the appeal by upholding duty demands but overturning the confiscation and penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>